3 Stooges

Moe seemed a combination Stooge and hard headed businessman. He was the one, after all, who had negotiated all of the team's contracts. Moe regretted the fact that The Stooges did not share in the enormous royalties from television showings of the shorts. Aside from money, he was deeply satisfied with his years as Head Stooge.
Source:
Three Stooges, A Starting Point
Laurel and Hardy

Laurel and Hardy began to be re-appreciated in the 1950's with the advent of television. Their old films were played quite often; many had entered the public domain and the television stations did not have to pay royalty fees to broadcast them. Hal Roach tried to reunite the film team in the 1950's but their ages and ill health prevented the reunion. Stan Laurel was married five times and divorced four times, twice to the same woman. He had two children with his first wife Lois Neilson. Neither Stan nor Oliver Hardy ever became wealthy because they did not own their film properties, neither did they receive a percentage of the profits. Stan died from heart failure on February 23rd, 1965, but not before receiving a special Academy Award in 1960 "for his creative pioneering in the field of cinema comedy."
Source:
GoldenSilents.com
Bob Denver/Cast of Gilligans Island, other sitcom stars of the 60s

Bill Green from Tennessee asked this about residuals: "I've heard that
casts from old shows don't get paid royalties for the reruns. Is this true?"
Bob: Unfortunately, for those of us starring in series up until the early part of the 70's,
that's very true. Our cast was paid off for reruns of Gilligan by 1968, which means
none of us has seen a penny in close to 40 years. Believe me, had we known about
mass syndication, videos, TV Land, cable, etc., we would have made better deals.
These days a successful series sets you up for life (think "Friends", "Frasier",
"Seinfeld", "ER" - the list goes on), but that wasn't true in the 60's!
Source:
Ask Bob
The standard operating procedure for the Entertainment Cartels has always been to exploit new avenues of providing entertainment for profit while depriving the creators of any share.
Bottom line is that the Home Computer as an avenue for entertainment is neither owned nor controlled by the Entertainment Cartels. Just as the original artists whose work was ripped off and sold for the new medium of Television, the new medium of the PC and the vehicle for digital delivery, the Internet, were not foreseen when the original content was created. Therefore, using the Entertainment Industries own standards, they are not entitled to any compensation.
Digital media formats such as mpg, avi, flac, etc. are not controlled proprietarily and therefore hold no means for controlling content converted to those formats for private use. The original content was legally purchased and converted. The product was packaged, sold and legally aquired. The digital copy can be reproduced endlessly without any loss of quality. The sad fact for the "owners" of so-called intellectual properties is that as long as people are able to copy content, they will. As long as the means to share digital content exists, sharing will also exist. To cry foul and attempt to paint themselves as victims of
theft is not only insanely hypocritical and laughably ironic, it is arguably a mere exersize in semantics. The floodgates have been opened and the freedom we enjoy can not be denied us. To attempt to create a criminal underclass of the millions of average, hardworking people who enjoy creating and sharing digital media is to deny the reality. To attempt to equate "lost sales" with the more accurate
"potential lost sales" is playing a numbers game with absolutely no basis in reality. People who share files also purchase media and attend various entertainment venues. The availability of fast, free digital media whets the appetite, but does not necessarily discourage the purchase of any and all other entertainment. It does mean that the Entertainment Cartels have finally run into a new venue they will not be able to exploit for enormous windfalls as they have been able to exploit Television, CDs, DVDs, etc. in the past. It means they will actually have to work harder to exploit this new resource and actually may have to earn
both their profits
and our respect. The former has all too often come easily to them and the latter has all too often never been a concern for them. The worm has turned..........